heinleinblog

News and opinion related to Robert A. Heinlein, the first grandmaster of science fiction



Archive for April, 2004

Mission accomplished

30th April 2004

I just want to report another successful day perverting the minds of America’s youth.

I took a substitute teaching assignment today. Little did the school district know that I didn’t take the job for the paltry $78.50 they pay for a day of babysitting kids while they watch educational videos.

I took the job for the opportunity it gave me to distribute the Master’s materials.

I successfully handed out “Podkayne of Mars” and “Starman Jones” to two different students.

I also convinced one of these students that if he was *really* into sword and sorcery, he should check out “Glory Road.”

Soon, all will be converted!

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Posted in Books, Fandom | 5 Comments »

I suggest they just let astronauts take matters into their own hands …

29th April 2004

Valentine Michael Smith — the hero of Heinlein’s “Stranger in a Strange Land” — was the result of an extramarital affair during a long voyage to Mars. He ended up in the soup — literally.

NASA, according to this article anyway, is talking steps to make sure that doesn’t happen:

In the First World War, frontline troops who were away from their loved ones for long periods famously had bromide put into their tea to reduce the distraction of their sexual drive. But yesterday it was suggested that such measures might be taken a lot further - to Mars, in fact.

Dr Rachel Armstrong, speaking yesterday at a British Interplanetary Society symposium on the Human Future and Space, said the US space agency NASA was considering how to deal with the natural urges of astronauts travelling on long journeys such as a three-year trip to Mars, where the six-strong crew would be likely to include two women.

“NASA is talking about the chemical sterilization of astronauts on longer journeys,” Dr Armstrong said, in a talk discussing the problems humanity may face in trying to reach the planets and, eventually, the stars.

NASA was nonplussed by the suggestion yesterday. “I haven’t heard anything about that,” said a spokesman at NASA’s Johnson Space Centre, where the long-range trips announced by President George Bush in January are being planned.

But that denial may hide a reluctance, in a nation where the showing of a nipple on national television provokes a religious outcry, to discuss the rather delicate subject of sex in space. Certainly, some scientists believe it is a topic that should be dealt with head on. Douglas Powell, a psychology professor at Harvard University who was recruited in 1999 by NASA to investigate the behavioral needs of long-term space trips, said: “Like anywhere, these are normal healthy people in their prime and they are sexually active so they are going to get involved with each other. So what’s going to happen in space? It’s a serious question and it needs to be confronted.”

Interestingly, there is no NASA ban on sex between crew members. “We depend and rely on the professionalism and good judgement of our astronauts,” said a NASA spokesman in 2000. “There is nothing specifically or formally written down.”

And that may be part of the problem. A crew heading to Mars would potentially be away for three years: six months travelling out, two years on the Red Planet waiting for the Earth to come back into alignment for the six-month trip back.

The psychological strains of such a trip would be huge, noted Dr Joanna Wood of NASA’s National Space Biomedical Research Institute, who compares it with the isolation experienced by scientists in Antarctica. But they have the comparative luxury that they can be rescued if necessary. With a Mars trip, there comes a point of no return determined by fuel and the planets’ positions.

“Interpersonal relations is a big issue, but we leave sexual stuff to the discretion of the individuals,” said Dr Wood.

Heh heh heh. Her name is “Dr. Wood.”

Sorry. I’m having a Beavis and Butthead moment here.

Seriously, the article also discusses a rumor that two astronauts have already engaged in sex — at the behest of NASA scientists wanting to study the prospects of long-term survival in outer space

Boy, talk about taking one for the team.

Posted in Spaceflight | No Comments »

Heinlein and ‘Futurama’

27th April 2004

“I’ve loved science fiction ever since I was a little kid, mainly from looking at the covers of science-fiction magazines and books, and I’ve read quite extensively as an adult. About three or four years ago, I decided to reacquaint myself with literary science-fiction and I went back and read everything from H.G. Wells to the new guys, Neal Stephenson and Rudy Rucker and those guys, and what I was surprised to find was that I’d read so much of it…

“But a lot of my old favorites I thought really held up, I liked [Robert] Heinlein and [Philip K.] Dick and Cordwainer Smith and Theodore Sturgeon and Robert Sheckley — the funny guys, the guys who have a sense of humor.”

–Matt Groening, interviewed by Brian Doherty in Mother Jones (March/April 1999)

That’s the opening to this Locus review of Groening’s hilarious, albeit canceled, show. It was too smart for it’s target audience.

Posted in In the news | No Comments »

Unfortunately, I have to agree

22nd April 2004

The Star Online looks at what makes a successful movie based on a science fiction novel. The conclusion:

So it’s not surprising that the “better” sci-fi movies are only loosely based on their sources. Dutch director Paul Verhoeven�s 1997 Starship Troopers was a fun but forgettable, alien-busting special-effects romp based on Robert Heinlein’s book of the same name.

The book was a satirical socio-political study of war and society; the movie was a shoot-’em-up with some witty, G.I. Joe gung-ho moments.

Verhoeven knows his medium, and his audience. Folks don�t want sci-fi movies that provoke thought; they want to go for an SFX ride. If you can inject some thought-provoking moments or issues, then that�s just icing on the cake of visual sci-fi.

Steal some of the ideas from the sci-fi book, but regurgitate it as an SFX-laden action-adventure. The latter keeps the audience glued to their seats, the former at least gives many talking points to the movie.

Because the writer tossed quotation marks around the word “successful,” I can agree with this assessment. Verhoeven’s movie was a financial, but not artistic, success.

The average video-game-loving male geek in his late teens and early 20s loved that movie. Lots of blood, guns, special effects and naked boobs, with no troublesome messages — other than Verhoeven’s simplistic military-equals-fascism message.

Posted in Books, Movies and Television | No Comments »

Suggested reading

22nd April 2004

• Akron Beacon Journal: In long stretches, Marines get by with books

Heinlein has always been a popular author among the military and veterans. That’s no surprise, considering that Heinlein himself was an Annapolis grad and a veteran. Duty and honor were frequent themes of his books. So the following isn’t surprising either.

Since 1989, the commandant of the Marine Corps has issued an annual reading list, with certain books suggested for certain ranks. The list is surprisingly pointed, even political.

For privates, the U.S. Constitution and Robert Heinlein’s Starship Troopers are among the suggested titles. For colonels, The Peloponnesian War by Thucydides; and for generals, In Retrospect: The Tragedy and Lessons of Vietnam, by Robert McNamara.

Posted in Books | No Comments »

‘Harmless’ Heinlein

21st April 2004

From The Alien Online:

Fantasy author Juliet McKenna is always full of enthusiasm for these kind of events. “I’m a great fan of public libraries and think they deserve all the support we writers can give them,” she said. “As a kid, I read everything I could get my hands on and my local branch library in Dorset was a god-send. My early inclination to SF&F was very well served since when the nice twin-set and pearls ladies had to agree I’d read absolutely everything in the kids section, they gave me permission to take SF&F books out of the adult section, despite the fact I was technically not old enough, because, obviously, if Robert Heinlein had books in the kids section, his adult stuff must be fairly harmless as well…

Harmless? How little they knew ;-)

Posted in Books, Education, Other Science Fiction | 2 Comments »

‘Operation: Suntan’ begins

1st April 2004

From The Price of Liberty:

In Robert Heinlein’s classic 1951 science fiction novel “The Puppet Masters”, a slug-like alien race capable of attaching themselves to human being’s spinal cord and controlling their minds secretly invades earth. A shadowy intelligence operation detects the alien menace, and led by the protagonist “Sam” and his partner “Mary” manages to defeat them. One of their biggest challenges after they understood what they were up against was preventing infiltration of “Zone Green”, the areas known to be free of puppet masters. One of the measures necessary to defeat the alien menace was “Schedule Suntan”, ordering uninfected civilians to wear a bare minimum of clothing (or less) so that the slugs would have no place to hide. Desperate measures for desperate times.

Ignoring for the moment the obvious allusion to the invisible spread of insidiously dangerous political ideas like trading fundamental liberties for the illusion of safety, I was reminded of Heinlein’s bare-skin solution by a discussion about so-called “airport security” on the Liberty Round Table’s mailing list recently. One of the ladies joked that an effective protest against the comically ineffective airport “security” screeners and their frequent groping of women was to arrange a protest by “a gaggle of freedom lovers” who present themselves to the screeners wearing nothing but a trench coat. As she put it, “What a way to protest the increasingly inane ’security’ measures… show up and strip naked right there in front of God, goons, and everybody else!”

Most of us are willing to show that much skin in public on the beach for recreation. We should be willing to sacrifice a little dignity to fight for our freedom. Identify yourself as both somebody who is no threat to the other passengers, and somebody who wants everyone to know they have utter disdain for the whole farcical proceedings. Be tasteful and respectful, and remember that there are probably kids watching. I’d suggest wearing a jacket over your bathing suit until you actually reach the screening area. Be sure to pointedly tell anyone who asks WHY you are under-dressed for the occasion. If possible, be prepared with flyers and information presenting alternatives. One good source of information you might find useful is the Project: Safe Skies web site I maintain at www.projectsafeskies.org.

Not a bad idea. Perhaps it will catch on.

Posted in In the news, Politics | No Comments »

Here are some … interesting … movie reviews

1st April 2004

Posted at Christian Cinema

Compromise would be so easy…Conviction is so costly.

Taylor Mitchell desperately needs his scholarship to stay in school. Physics Professor, Dr. Heinlein, insists that Taylor abandon his “mythological religious approach” to creation and base his thinking on “fact and the scientific method.” Taylor’s final grade will depend on his fulfillment of Dr. Heinlein’s assignment - a scientifically sound paper on evolution.

His professor’s constant harassment about this “unscientific view of creation” has wearied Taylor. Is this truly a Test of Faith or an “assignment on reality?” Is Professor Heinlein’s claim true, that “faith is an obstacle, an enemy to clear scientific thinking?”

How would you approach this test? Will Taylor pass? Would you?

When I checked it out about a dozen reviews had been added. The reviewers? None other than Theodore Bronson, Fader McGee, Reverend Nehemiah Scudder, John Rico, Hugh Farnham, Patty Paiwonski, Alex Hergensheimer, V. Michael Smith, and this one reviewer by Simon D. Gester:

What a truly remarkababel piece of cinema! I was in a froth of fervent ecstacy! And ever since I have given up Ecstasy, the evil of the world has become all the clearer to me! Demonic forces in the form of filthy, evil Doktor Heinlein, played by the dastardly David Robey and his pointy goatee are personified with passion. I wonder how anyone could merely PLAY the part of evil like this man does without BEING evil! He obviously read the works, if you can call them that, of the anti-Christian Robert A. Heinlein; may his body rot in the ground. Hiding behind the ideas of thinking for yourself, Heinlein was directly attacking the Christain faith. While I have never read any of the works of Heinlein (my fingers would burst into flames) I am assured that this is the case. While the cinematography has something to be desired, these actors do a wonderful job of working with what they have got. And I am so glad to see Kirk Cameron back on the screen! His role as an angst driven teen in Growing Pains is so far away from this poor maligned teen forced to think outside what he is normally comfortable with. Evolution! Rage and cheer at the struggles of the hero! Cheer with him as he rails against the attempts to make him, forcefully, accept the ideas of evolution. Creation remains triumphant in this great movie!

I can see it now: Roger dumps that other guy and changes the name of the show to “Ebert and Gester At The Movies.”

UPDATE: Oh, Bummer. I visited the site and they pulled all the reviews.

I guess my review from “John Thomas” won’t make it …

Posted in In the news, Movies and Television | No Comments »