heinleinblog

News and opinion related to Robert A. Heinlein, the first grandmaster of science fiction



Archive for October, 2003

Hal Clement, a Grandmaster of Science Fiction, Dies

30th October 2003

From the LOCUS Website:

Harry Clement Stubbs, who wrote science fiction as Hal Clement, died in his sleep earlier today, October 29, 2003, at his home in Milton, Massachusetts.

Born in 1922, Clement was a high school school teacher whose fiction gained a reputation as quintessential hard SF — science fiction firmly based on established physics, chemistry, and astronomy. His novels often depicted highly imagined alien worlds; the most famous was Mission of Gravity, set on a heavy, fast-spinning planet where the force of gravity is several times greater at the poles than at the equator. His last novel, Noise, was published earlier this year.

Clement was named a Grand Master by the Science Fiction Writers of America in 1999. Among other honors was a Retro-Hugo Award in 1996 for his 1945 story “Uncommon Sense”.

Posted in In the news, Other Science Fiction | No Comments »

Forry on Heinlein

30th October 2003

Forrest J. Ackerman is profiled in the Los Angeles City Beat: The Day After the Night of the Living Dead

He also became a kind of ad-hoc museum curator. From time to time, he opens his home so the public can view the props, costumes, and art, and just hang around and talk. Conversations with Ackerman are generally the highlight of the visit. Though he is elderly and sometimes speaks slowly, he has an excellent memory and casually recalls conversations with Lugosi, Vincent Price, Robert Heinlein, and even H.G. Wells.

Actually Ackerman and Heinlein had a falling out over Ackerman’s unauthorized publication of a speech Heinlein gave at the 3d World Science Fiction Convention.

I also Googled up an earlier interview with Ackerman in which he discusses how “Solution Unsatisfactory” was inspired by a lecture by H.G. Wells that both Ackerman and (presumably) Heinlein attended. There also is a brief mention of a visit by Ackerman to the set of “Destination: Moon.”

Posted in Fandom, In the news | No Comments »

Sounds like Heinlein to me

26th October 2003

I’m in favor of encouraging people to read new types of books. But, was it necessary to pitch this book by dissing Heinlein and other golden age greats?

“The City Trilogy,” by Chang Hsi-Kuo. This science-fiction novel (actually a collection of three novellas that are tied together in an arc) is the first English translation of this noted Taiwanese writer’s work. Banish from your mind thoughts of Heinlein, Asimov and Clark, and enjoy this look at the way Chinese culture has shaped thoughts of the future. As the Huhui people try to overthrow their interstellar overlords, the Han, they must gain the cooperation of the several other races that share their planet. Alliances continually shift, and political machinations abound, keeping readers on their toes in this very different allegorical tale.

Hrumph!

Actually, the person who wrote this blurb doesn’t know his/her Heinlein. Fighting to overthrow oppressors? Political machinations? Sounds like any number of Heinlein books — “If This Goes On …,” “The Moon is a Harsh Mistress,” “Red Planet,” etc.

Posted in Books, Reviews | No Comments »

Let the subversion of America’s youth BEGIN!

21st October 2003

BWAHAHAHA!

My master plan went into effect today.

On the last of a three-day-long substitute teaching assignment, I nonchalantly asked the class: “Anyone here like to read science fiction?”

“Yes!” One teenage girl answered. “I like the older stuff.”

“Really?” I said, twirling my mustache is a Snidely Whiplash fashion. “I just *happened* to be reorganizing my bookshelves yesterday, and I found that I had more than one copy of these books …” I placed five paperbacks on the desk — “Tunnel in the Sky,” “Time For the Stars,” “Orphans in the Sky” “Double Star” and “Starman Jones.”

“You can have any of these or all of them if you like,” I said, hiding my sinister enthusiasm. “Heinlein is one of the masters of the golden age of science fiction. He’s won a ton of awards — this one won a Hugo — and they’ve done some movies of some of his work, although the books are much, much better.”

She grabbed them all, which is what any real science fan would do.

Later on, I mentioned that she could visit http://heinleinsociety.org if she wanted to learn more.

Now I must visit the used book store and restock. I went and gave away my last copy of Starman Jones.

I keep this up, soon every student in Central Illinois will be reading Heinlein! BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Posted in Education, Heinlein Society | No Comments »

Cool Website alert

18th October 2003

This guy runs a site that real-life lists inventions that made their first appearance in science fiction. Heinlein has two full pages. There stuff on this list I forgot about, or barely remembered because of the matter-of-a-fact way RAH managed to slip them into his stories.

Posted in Links | 4 Comments »

‘Where do we go from here’

15th October 2003

The following article for “immediate and general release” was written by sci-fi author L. Neil Smith and posted on sci.space.shuttle and again on alt.fan.heinlein.

I am reprinting it here:

The October, 2003 issue of “Discover” contains one of the saddest letters I’ve ever read. Gil Bell, of Duluth, Georgia, writes ” … one would have to conclude that travel out of our solar system is impossible. The fusion, fission, and antimatter engines require too much fuel … The laser sail is doomed by the fact that building a 6,600-mile-wide collecting mirror is simply not feasible, and … a 600-mile-wide sail would be torn apart by cosmic debris on a daily basis. And why build a fusion ramjet when there’s no fuel in space to run it, and its design would not allow it to attain the speed it needs?

“The fusion or fission engine concepts would be useful in getting around out own solar system, but what’s the use in traveling to other planets in our neighborhood? Venus will never be inhabitable and neither will Mars or any of the Jovian planets or their moons, and changing the environment on another planet will never be within our capabilities. It is fun to speculate on way that humans might accomplish interstellar travel, but in the end it is just more science fiction.”

There are lot of unsupported assertions in Mr. Bell’s letter, and a great many factual errors (most of them, I’m afraid, based on an incredible ignorance of history), but the saddest thing about it is its spirit of defeat. As I said in a recent essay, Americans seem to have given up on the future. This letter from “Discover” is typical
and symptomatic.

But it doesn’t speak for everyone.

I’ve been reading the works of Robert A. Heinlein (as the Brits say, “man and boy”) for forty-six years, having found his books when I was sent to the school library to spend several afternoons there as a punishment. After all these years, I don’t recall what for, more’s the pity.

In all that time (and earlier, in fact) I always expected that, sooner or later, I’d end up space myself, maybe even die there (after living a couple hundred years, like Lazarus Long). And although I didn’t necessarily want to move there, the one sight I always wanted most to see in person was Saturn and its rings, from one of its inner moons.

As I grew up, I became disappointed and disillusioned. The Mercury program came and went, the Gemini program came and went, the Apollo program came and went, followed by SkyLab, the Shuttle program, and the International so-called Space Station. What they all taught us (unless you actually care about fruitfly reproduction in microgravity) was that the only individuals who would _ever_ be allowed to get into space were precisely the kind of government-approved jockstraps who were on the varsity football team when you were in high school — oh yes, and an occasional cheerleader — oops, make that public school teacher.

To all the rest of us, meaning those who are “encouraged” (at the point of a gun) to pay for these programs, the message was clear: “Get lost. Outer space, 99.99999999999999999999999999999999 percent of all there is, is government property, like the Lincoln Monument and Area 51.”

Nothing has happened in all that time to change that. Just look at the bewildering maze of impossible regulations the government relies on to keep anyone else from trying out a new vehicle design, or from launching anything without their permission and supervision. Or the way they squirmed and struggled, trying to keep that zillionaire space “tourist” on the ground. Or the way they’re employing the handy (if illegal) Homeland Security concept in an attempt to shut down model
rocketry.

Novelist Victor Koman was dead right, when he said (in his great work, _Kings of the High Frontier_) that the actual mission of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration — its not-so-hidden agenda, having nothing to do with the development of space travel and exploration — is to keep scum like you and me from ever getting into space.

At the same time (as Victor also points out), NASA mouthpieces have been telling the public since the 1960s that our being able to visit space, perhaps even vacationing on the Moon, or in zero gravity at a space station, was “only about thirty years away”. That’s what they said in the 60s, that’s what they said in the 70s, that’s what they said in the 80s, that’s what they said in the 90s, and that’s what they’re still saying today. It’s always just about thirty years away.

In a way, you can’t blame the government. Being what they are, politicians and bureaucrats, they have a very unhealthy tendency to project their own ethical and psychological shortcomings onto others, especially members of the unwashed public. Even before September 11, 2001 — and before Luis and Walter Alvarez discovered what it really was that killed the dinosaurs — someone in government read Heinlein’s “The Moon is a Harsh Mistress” (individuals are paid to do that; see James Grady’s ‘Six Days of the Condor ‘), in which penal colonists on the Moon ultimately achieve their independence by threatening major cities on Earth with boxcar-sized rocks, launched from an electric catapult.

Like politicians who push victim disarmament (erroneously known as gun control), they’re afraid they’re going to get what they deserve. So if you ever want to see Saturn’s rings (or any other astronomical wonder) up close, you must absorb the following truth and never forget it: given their way, governments will _never_ let ordinary people into space.

Never.

Quite aside from the question of boxcar-sized rocks, think of the historically unprecedented savagery with which the Union prosecuted the War between the States. Think of similar savagery at Waco. Think about the War on Drugs — and recall why many folks use drugs to begin with.

You’re not allowed to escape.

Governments will do anything — absolutely anything, no matter how violent or morally repulsive it happens to be — to prevent anybody from getting out from under their authoritarian thumb. If you don’t shut your mouth, sit up straight, fold your hands, look at them when they’re lecturing you, and spit that gum out this minute, they’ll kill you.

However if there’s on thing I’ve learned about politics over the last half century, it’s that, when there’s something you need to do, and government (or anybody else) stands in your way, you simply say you’re doing it “for the children” — and it helps if you really mean it.

I really mean it.

I have a little daughter I sometimes regret having brought into this world because it’s become such a dark and horrifying place. If I believed that she could live her life in some of the places I’ve described in my novels — that I’m describing again in the novels I’m writing now — I would do virtually anything I could just to make that
happen.

And if I could go there myself … Well, there just might be a way.

Roughly a hundred years ago, Lord Robert Baden-Powell was having a tough time, don’t you know, in one of Britain’s last fun wars, because the soldiers she shipped to South Africa by the, er, shipload, didn’t have a clue how to survive in the open country. Their foes were Dutch-African settlers — “Boer” means “farmer” — who lived and worked there very day. They knew what plants to eat and where to find decent water.

When Baden-Powell got home to Old Blighty, he created the group that was to become known as the Boy Scouts, to fix the shortcomings he’d seen in Africa. The idea was imitated in many other countries, including the United States to impressive effect. I was in the program myself, from 1954 as a Bear Cub, to about 1963, by which time I was an Explorer Scout, an Eagle, and a Brotherhood member of the Order of the Arrow. I also held 23 merit badges, a God & Country Award (believe it
or not), a translator bar (German), and a whole ladderful of BSA/NRA sharpshooter bars. Although the roots of the Boy Scouts are sordidly statist, scouting was practically my whole childhood, and a very good one.

About the same time I first got into scouting — and well before the Soviets’ Sputnik scared the Eisenhower Administration shitless, spitless, and witless — I began to collect newspaper clippings and magazine articles about space and space exploration. I also bought a book about going to the Moon on a visit to the Chicago Museum of Science and Industry — the author opined that no single government would ever be able to afford such a trip, so the idea must be turned over to the United Nations; and wouldn’t that have been interesting? — and I’d vowed that very evening to stand, someday, on the Moon, myself.

So what have I found in all my experiences that might be useful in solving our little space problem? The basic idea is simple, it’s just a lot of hard work. At the moment, I’m writing _Ceres_ (a sequel to my 1993 novel _Pallas_) which concerns itself with terraforming asteroids and preventing “extinction level events” like the one 65 million years ago that killed the dinosaurs. _Ceres_ is not meant to be anybody’s fantasy (although one of my former editors informed me that I’m not
qualified to write on this subject); it’s meant as a blueprint for the future.

I’m also doing research now for another novel, _Ares_, which will stand, chronologically, right between _Pallas_ and _Ceres_. It’s about the men and women who terraform Mars, despite violent opposition from Earth.

At the same time, I’ve begun collecting ideas and material for a third book, the working title of which will be (for lack of anything better) _The Space Scout Manual_. That book will try to do three things.

First, it will help young people (I’m aiming the book at a certain mindset, rather than a given age group; it should appeal at some level to everyone of both sexes between the ages of 5 and 20) to prepare themselves for working, living, and eventually settling in space, in more or less the same way that my old Boy Scouts of America manual, _A Handbook For Boys_ (1955 edition), helped to prepare me to survive — and even prosper — in several different kinds of wilderness on this
planet.

The book will also contain detailed instructions and suggestions for establishing your own local chapter of what I’m presently calling (again, for lack of anything better) the “Space Scouts” and everything necessary to affiliate it with a national organization of the same name. Unlike a great many other organizations I’ve been involved with, I want this one always to grow from the ground up, not from the top down.

The _Space Scout Manual_’s third mission will be to establish a political constituency for abolishing NASA and getting government out of the way of space exploration. If the book, and the organization it creates, are useful and interesting enough, then within a few years, there should be hundreds of thousands of young Space Scouts and maybe, a few years after that, millions. Politicians and bureaucrats will eventually be up against an enormous group of voters who are educated,
tough, who won’t take “No” (or even “Give us another 30 years”) for an answer.

I want this book to get into conventional distribution channels and to show up on paperback racks everywhere. I want this book in airports and grocery stores where the words SPACE SCOUT MANUAL will leap out at all those who had almost — but not quite — given up the dream.

Please note that the manual will not be about the current hardware of government space exploration (which is constantly changing anyway) but about personal physical, mental, and moral preparation. It will draw on history, and on both factual and fictional sources. Also, it will give its readers the beginnings of a decent science education (another thing public schools were never up to), and encourage in them a proper skepticism with regard to public education and the democratic
process.

Another reason not to get bogged down in such details is that there’s no telling what methods of spaceflight will evolve if this
idea works.

The book’s moral outlook will be rooted in the Bill of Rights and the libertarian Zero Aggression Principle, but it will not preach. It will assume from the outset that individuals own their own lives and the products of their lives, and that no one has a right to initiate force against another human — no, make that _sapient_ — being for any reason.

The book will advocate “Reconstitutive Unanimous Consent” as the preferred means of making group decisions and settling disputes. It will also advise politicians and bureaucrats that, from the moment that the first off-planet settlement is created, on Mars, on the Moon, in the Asteroid Belt, or wherever, it should reasonably be expected to become politically independent of Earth whenever its people want it to be.

Don’t let any of the above mislead you, however. This will not be a book about libertarian or constitutionalist philosphy. It will be a book about getting into space and staying there. It will be guided as much by the scientific method as it will be by the Zero Aggression Principle. Its largest section, by far, will be a detailed survey and commentary (despite that editor’s view that I’m not qualified to write it) on everything that’s known, at the moment, about the Solar System, including its constituent star, its planets, moons, planetoids, and comets.

It will also talk — again in detail — about all of the many reasons we might want to see these things close up, and even go to live on, in, or among them. Those reasons will range from what might be called the “spiritual” — because it’s the destiny of humankind and a good first step to the stars — to the exceedingly practical: our species won’t survive another rock like the one that put an end the Cretacious; we’re 15 million years overdue, so we have to go out and stop it, the topic of a lecture I delivered to the Eris Society in 2000.

Your thirty years are up, NASA.

They’ve been up a couple of times over.

There will be no more waiting politely. Even if it has to be done like the moldy old joke — the hotel clerk admits that a room is available, but you’ll have to make your own bed; upstairs you find you’ve been supplied with a hammer, saw, and lumber — it _will_ be done.

So this is what I’ve given up electoral politics for — at least this decade, when the goodguys are powerless. But I think I’ve traded up. I’m ready to make my own bed. And to plant the seedlings for the lumber.

How about you?

Posted in Spaceflight | No Comments »

Mixed feelings about China’s success in space

15th October 2003

http://space.com/images/v_liwei_shenzhou_02.jpg

On one hand, I’m glad some nation is serious about space exploration. On the other, I’m P.O.ed that it’s not the United States of America. I suppose a nation can afford a real space program when it’s military owns and operates businesses, a right either denied its citizens or heavily regulated.

Posted in Politics, Spaceflight | No Comments »

Heinlein Prize Trust Makes Matching Funds Pledge

11th October 2003

AUGUST 27, 2003 - The trustees of the Robert A. and Virginia Heinlein Prize
Trust pledged that they will match contributions to the Heinlein Society for
the remainder of 2003 up to a total of $15,000.

Between August 27 and September 1 the Heinlein Society has raised a total
of $3,400, leaving more than $11,000 in the matching funds pledge.

We have until the end of December. Please help us gain the full benefit of
the Heinlein Prize Trust’s generous offer.

Pay it Forward!

Contribute Now

(Hat tip to David Wright)

Posted in Heinlein Society | No Comments »

New Red Planet photos

8th October 2003

New Mars photos astound scientists

http://a799.g.akamai.net/3/799/388/1c01c71b9974ed/msnbc.com/news/2034929.jpg

The white stuff is believed to be frozen water that remains throughout the Martian summer.

Posted in Science, Spaceflight | No Comments »

‘It’s in the genes’

7th October 2003

Here’s a Time article about an Italian village brimming with octogenarians that makes me think of the Howard Foundation.

But Agostino Vargiu, who serves up those same ingredients at his downtown restaurant, has another hypothesis. “The food and the air probably help,” Vargiu says. “But the point is that there’s very little intermarrying with outsiders here. In Orroli, we’re all practically relatives. It’s in the genes.” That same logic — and the same noted propensity for long life in nearby towns — prompted molecular biologist Luca Deiana to launch a sweeping genetic study of every 100-plus person across the entire island. “You look at a Sardinian phone book and you see there are relatively few last names,” says Deiana, a researcher at the University of Sassari in northwest Sardinia. The project — dubbed A Kent’Annos after an old Sardinian salute meaning, “May you live to be 100″ — confirmed that the island has the world’s highest documented percentage of people who have passed the century threshold. Of 1.6 million Sardinians, there are at least 220 who have reached 100, twice the typical ratio. Five of the world’s 40 oldest people live on the island, and until the January death of Antonio Todde at 112, Sardinia boasted the oldest of them all.

Hat tip to Kate from alt.fan.heinlein and member of The Heinlein Society.

Posted in Science | 2 Comments »